Agrivoltaics: Energy and Agriculture on the Same Land
Agrivoltaics allows a farm to produce energy without giving up its land, which is why it has been supported by a dedicated PNRR measure—administered by the GSE through grants and feed-in tariffs—whose application period closed in June 2026. However, the benefit depends on a condition often treated as a mere formality: agricultural activity must actually continue, not just meet a requirement on paper. We verify the actual agronomic compatibility, the cost-effectiveness, and the contracts on the property owner’s side: for approved projects through to operation, and for new projects, we assess the viable paths available today.
The Challenges of Agrivoltaics
Before committing land and capital, an agrivoltaic project must be evaluated on a few key points that, taken together, determine whether it is sound and cost-effective.
Agronomic Compatibility
The actual continuity of agricultural production while the system is in operation distinguishes a genuine agrivoltaic system—one eligible for support—from a photovoltaic system in disguise. This is not a mere formality: eligibility for the incentive and its continued validity over time depend on this, with the corresponding consequences in the event of an audit.
Support and Compliance
The PNRR measure, a subsidy administered by the GSE, provides eligible projects with a capital grant of up to 40% plus a tariff on the net energy fed into the grid. The eligibility phase ended in June 2026: for those holding a concession, we verify compliance with the agreement and any grounds for termination through the end of the fiscal year.
Timeline and Implementation
The implementation deadlines begin with the concession agreement: the project must be operational within approximately two years and, in any case, no later than the end of 2027, or the concession will be forfeited. No new funding opportunities have been announced: those evaluating an agrivoltaic project today must plan for it without PNRR support, focusing on self-consumption, energy sales, and agreements with operators, while awaiting any new funding instruments.
Rental or Investment
The decision between granting land to a developer and investing on one’s own radically changes the return and risk. We evaluate this based on the company’s financials, not on a general rule.
Contracts Offered by Third Parties
Leases and ground leases offered by developers often bind the property for decades. Before signing, we review the term, rent payments, obligations, and exit clauses applicable to the owner.
What We Check
Four factors determine whether the project is sound and worthwhile.
Agronomic Compatibility
The actual continuity of agricultural operations while the facility is in operation.
Support force
For approved projects, compliance with the agreement and grounds for termination through the fiscal year.
Affordability
Returns compared to the alternatives: renting or direct investment.
Third-Party Contracts
The balance of rent and surface rights, as interpreted by the property owners.
How We Support You
We conduct feasibility and suitability assessments, review contracts proposed by third parties, work with the property owner to identify the appropriate solution, and oversee the implementation—always on behalf of the owner.
Go to related pages
Where to learn more, within the world of Onirico Suisse.
A first look at the project.
Tell us about your land and farming activities—including crops or livestock, land area, and any proposals you’ve received. We’ll respond with an initial technical and economic assessment, provided confidentially, regarding the project’s feasibility and compatibility.